Day 103 / 168 Week 18 of 28 Phase 4: Integration + Timed Sections

Three-Section Review: The Full Blind-Review Protocol

🕑 ~90 min · Archetype E — Review / Trap Analysis

Three-Section Review: The Full Blind-Review Protocol

Blind-reviewing Saturday's three-section sitting at full scale — the same protocol as every prior review, just applied across LR, RC, and LR together for the first time.

What to Look For Specifically

Standard blind review on all three sections: redo unsure questions untimed, compute the blind-review gap.
Compare accuracy in section 3 (the second LR section) against section 1 (the first LR section) — a meaningful drop suggests fatigue accumulating across a longer sitting, which Phase 4 directly addresses.
Log everything, and carry your updated weak-area list into this week's integration work.

Practice items on this page are curriculum-authored in LSAT style; they are not official LSAC questions. Real drilling happens on LawHub — see the assignment below.

Q1. Section 1 (LR) accuracy: 85%. Section 3 (LR, after RC in between): 68%. What does this pattern suggest?

A. No meaningful pattern

B. Fatigue accumulating across the longer sitting — exactly what Phase 4's stamina work targets

C. Section 3 was simply harder by chance, ignore it

D. You should stop taking full sittings

Correct answer: B. A same-question-type accuracy drop late in a longer sitting is a classic fatigue signature, not chance — stamina becomes explicit Phase 4 content starting this week.

Tomorrow: LR pacing inside full section context — two-pass strategy, flag-and-return, and the skip decision, formalized.

← Day 102: Phase 3 Close: Three Timed Sections (LR, RC, LR), the First Full-Length Sitting Without an Experimental Section Day 104: LR Pacing: Two-Pass Sections, Flag-and-Return & the Skip Decision →