Must Be True II: Formal-Logic Inferences (Conditionals & Quantifiers)
Must Be True II: Formal-Logic Inferences
The most mechanical Inference variant: stimuli built almost entirely from conditionals and quantifiers, where the correct answer is a valid logical consequence you derive by chaining.
1. Diagram First
Translate every conditional/quantified statement before reading the answer choices. This type rewards the Week 2/3 diagramming discipline directly.
2. Chain, Then Check Each Answer
Derive every valid inference you can from the diagram before looking at choices; the correct answer is almost always one of these, sometimes via the contrapositive.
Practice items on this page are curriculum-authored in LSAT style; they are not official LSAC questions. Real drilling happens on LawHub — see the assignment below.
Q1. Given "If a proposal lacks funding, it is tabled" and "This proposal was not tabled," what follows?
LawHub drill-tier LR section, untimed. Scan for conditional-heavy Must Be True stimuli.
An RC maintenance day tomorrow introducing comparative passages, then Must Be False closes the core Inference trio.