Strengthen II: Causal Arguments, Plans & Strengthen-EXCEPT
Strengthen II: Causal Plans & Strengthen-EXCEPT
Two remaining Strengthen patterns: strengthening a plan/prediction argument, and the EXCEPT variant, where four answers strengthen and the correct one is the one that doesn't.
1. Strengthening Plan Arguments
"Doing X will achieve Y" arguments are strengthened by evidence that X is feasible, that X will actually cause Y, or that no significant side effect will undermine Y.
2. Strengthen-EXCEPT
Same double-check-the-stem discipline from Day 5: four choices strengthen, one doesn't (it's either neutral or actually weakens). Read the stem twice before touching answer choices.
3. Distinguishing "Doesn't Strengthen" From "Weakens"
The correct EXCEPT answer can be either irrelevant or actively weakening — both satisfy "does not strengthen." Don't assume it has to be a weakener.
Practice items on this page are curriculum-authored in LSAT style; they are not official LSAC questions. Real drilling happens on LawHub — see the assignment below.
Q1. Argument: "Switching to a four-day work week will increase productivity." Which of the following would NOT strengthen this argument?
LawHub drill-tier LR section, untimed. Scan for Strengthen and Strengthen-EXCEPT stems.
Saturday: full synthesis of the assumption family — Necessary Assumption, Sufficient Assumption, and Strengthen, contrasted directly, closing out Week 6.