Day 44 / 168 Week 8 of 28 Phase 2: Logical Reasoning Deep Dive

Most Strongly Supported: Soft Inference & Strength of Language

🕑 ~75 min · Archetype A — LR Deep Dive

Most Strongly Supported: Soft Inference

A close cousin of Must Be True with a slightly relaxed standard: the answer doesn't have to be logically airtight, just the best-supported claim among the five choices.

1. "Most" Is Comparative

You're picking the strongest-supported choice relative to the other four, not proving certainty. This is genuinely a different mental operation from Must Be True.

2. Still No Wild Leaps

"Slightly looser" doesn't mean "any plausible inference." The correct answer is still clearly better supported than the other four, usually by a wide margin.

Practice items on this page are curriculum-authored in LSAT style; they are not official LSAC questions. Real drilling happens on LawHub — see the assignment below.

Q1. Stimulus: "In the last decade, every company that adopted the new safety protocol reduced workplace injuries, though the size of the reduction varied widely." Which is most strongly supported?

A. The protocol is required by law

B. Adopting the protocol is associated with some reduction in workplace injuries, though the size of that reduction is not fixed

C. The protocol eliminates all injuries

D. Companies that don't adopt the protocol have more injuries than any that do

Correct answer: B. This closely tracks the stated pattern (adoption → some reduction, varying amount) without overclaiming certainty, elimination, or an unsupported comparison to non-adopters.

LawHub drill-tier LR section, untimed. Scan for "most strongly supported" stems.

Must Be True II tomorrow: formal-logic inferences built from conditionals and quantifiers, tying directly back to Weeks 2 and 3.

← Day 43: Must Be True / Inference I: Staying Inside the Stimulus Day 45: Must Be True II: Formal-Logic Inferences (Conditionals & Quantifiers) →