Day 34 of 168 · Week 6
Day 34 / 168 Week 6 of 28 Phase 2: Logical Reasoning Deep Dive

RC Maintenance: Inference Questions in RC

🕑 ~75 min · Archetype B — RC Deep Dive

RC Maintenance: Inference Questions in RC

RC Inference questions ask for what the passage's content supports as true, without being stated outright — the passage-level version of the standard you'll formalize for LR next month.

1. Supported vs. Merely Plausible

The correct answer must be directly supported by combining statements in the passage — not just consistent with the passage's general spirit. This distinction is where most RC Inference errors happen.

2. Combining Statements Across Paragraphs

Unlike Detail questions, Inference answers often require connecting a claim in one paragraph with a claim in another.

3. The Extreme-Language Check

Same RC-EXTREME trap as always: check that the inferred claim's strength matches what the passage actually supports, not more.

Practice items on this page are curriculum-authored in LSAT style; they are not official LSAC questions. Real drilling happens on LawHub — see the assignment below.

Q1. Using Day 10's algorithmic-pricing passage: what can be inferred about the "no communication occurs" economists' view?

A. They believe tacit price convergence is impossible
B. They likely would not classify the pricing convergence as illegal collusion under current legal frameworks that require coordination
C. They believe algorithms should be banned
D. They agree fully with the second group of economists
Correct answer: B. The passage states this group argues that because no communication occurs, the outcome 'cannot properly be called collusion in the legal sense' — a direct textual support for this inference.

LawHub drill-tier RC passage, untimed, focused on Inference questions.

Strengthen II tomorrow, then Saturday closes the Assumption family (NA, SA, Strengthen) with a full synthesis before Weaken opens Week 7.