Phase 2 Checkpoint Review: LR Accuracy by Type & Timing Diagnosis
Phase 2 Checkpoint Review: LR Accuracy by Type & Timing Diagnosis
Before Phase 3 shifts the spotlight to RC, blind-review Saturday's Phase 2 close and take a full inventory of nine weeks of LR data — this becomes the baseline Phase 3's weekly LR maintenance days work to preserve.
Full Phase 2 Audit
- Blind-review Day 72's two sections per the standard protocol.
- Tally accuracy across all of Phase 2 by family: Describe, Assumption/gap, Inference, Principle/Parallel.
- Compare timing trend across all checkpoints so far (Days 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 48, 60, 66, 72) — is the trend still improving, plateaued, or noisy?
- Write down your single remaining weakest LR area in one sentence — this becomes the target for the weekly LR maintenance days ahead.
Practice items on this page are curriculum-authored in LSAT style; they are not official LSAC questions. Real drilling happens on LawHub — see the assignment below.
Q1. Your timing trend across nine checkpoints shows steady improvement through Week 8, then a plateau. What is the most reasonable next step?
Correct answer: B. A plateau after real gains is a signal to maintain, not abandon or over-correct — exactly what Phase 3's weekly LR maintenance days are built to do.
Phase 3 begins tomorrow: five weeks dedicated to Reading Comprehension, opening with RC method and active-reading discipline.